← All companies ← HTCO Manual HTLM → ← HLT Hotels & Resorts IHG →
HTHT, H World Group Limited
A hotel and lodging business, earning on rooms filled and the brand that fills them.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run about 17% through the cycle, a solid margin the cost base and competition set as much as the price does. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −17% and 27% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Capital spending runs about 10% of sales, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on occupancy and revenue per available room, and the model. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on concentrated dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →China is 81% of revenue, so this is largely a single-region business.
- China81%CN¥20.5B
- Germany13%CN¥3.4B
- All others6%CN¥1.4B
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| CN¥6.6B | CN¥8.2B | CN¥10.1B | CN¥11.2B | CN¥10.2B | CN¥12.8B | CN¥13.9B | CN¥21.9B | CN¥23.9B | CN¥25.3B | CN¥25.3B | RevenueRevenue |
| CN¥841M | CN¥1.4B | CN¥2.3B | CN¥2.1B | (CN¥1.7B) | CN¥164M | (CN¥294M) | CN¥4.7B | CN¥5.2B | CN¥6.8B | CN¥6.8B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 12.8% | 17.3% | 23.3% | 18.8% | −16.5% | 1.3% | −2.1% | 21.5% | 21.8% | 26.9% | 26.9% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| CN¥774M | CN¥1.2B | CN¥727M | CN¥1.8B | (CN¥2.2B) | (CN¥480M) | (CN¥1.8B) | CN¥4.1B | CN¥3.1B | CN¥5.1B | CN¥5.1B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 26% | 23% | 44% | 27% | — | — | — | 23% | 35% | 30% | 30% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| CN¥2.1B | CN¥2.5B | CN¥3.0B | CN¥3.3B | CN¥609M | CN¥1.3B | CN¥1.6B | CN¥7.7B | CN¥7.5B | CN¥8.4B | CN¥8.4B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| CN¥695M | CN¥789M | CN¥891M | CN¥991M | CN¥1.4B | CN¥1.5B | CN¥1.5B | CN¥1.4B | CN¥1.3B | CN¥1.3B | CN¥1.3B | DepreciationDeprec. |
| CN¥597M | CN¥436M | CN¥1.4B | CN¥541M | CN¥1.5B | CN¥319M | CN¥2.0B | CN¥2.1B | CN¥3.1B | CN¥2.0B | CN¥2.0B | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| — | CN¥819M | CN¥1.1B | CN¥1.5B | CN¥1.7B | CN¥1.7B | CN¥1.0B | CN¥894M | CN¥883M | CN¥828M | CN¥998M | CapexCapex |
| — | 10.0% | 11.1% | 13.6% | 17.1% | 13.0% | 7.6% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 3.3% | 3.9% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| — | CN¥1.6B | CN¥2.2B | CN¥2.3B | (CN¥753M) | (CN¥316M) | CN¥515M | CN¥6.8B | CN¥6.6B | CN¥7.6B | CN¥7.4B | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| — | 19.9% | 21.4% | 20.5% | −7.4% | −2.5% | 3.7% | 31.0% | 27.8% | 29.8% | 29.2% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| — | CN¥1.6B | CN¥1.9B | CN¥1.8B | (CN¥1.1B) | (CN¥316M) | CN¥515M | CN¥6.8B | CN¥6.6B | CN¥7.6B | CN¥7.4B | Free cash flowFCF |
| — | 19.9% | 19.2% | 15.8% | −11.1% | −2.5% | 3.7% | 31.0% | 27.8% | 29.8% | 29.2% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| CN¥276M | CN¥306M | CN¥660M | CN¥658M | CN¥678M | — | CN¥416M | CN¥2.1B | CN¥3.5B | CN¥3.9B | CN¥3.9B | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | — | CN¥107M | CN¥107M | CN¥107M | CN¥0 | CN¥334M | CN¥848M | CN¥1.2B | CN¥783M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 14% | 20% | 12% | 24% | -19% | -4% | -21% | 34% | 25% | 40% | 40% | Return on equityROE |
| 9% | 15% | 1% | 15% | −25% | — | −26% | 17% | −3% | 9% | 9% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| CN¥3.2B | CN¥3.6B | CN¥4.3B | CN¥3.2B | CN¥7.0B | CN¥5.1B | CN¥5.4B | CN¥9.1B | CN¥11.1B | CN¥15.3B | CN¥15.3B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| CN¥142M | CN¥163M | CN¥195M | CN¥218M | CN¥404M | CN¥521M | CN¥1.1B | CN¥755M | CN¥817M | CN¥723M | CN¥723M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| CN¥22M | CN¥24M | CN¥41M | CN¥57M | CN¥89M | CN¥88M | CN¥70M | CN¥59M | CN¥60M | CN¥57M | CN¥57M | InventoryInvent. |
| CN¥585M | CN¥766M | CN¥890M | CN¥1.2B | CN¥1.2B | CN¥968M | CN¥1.2B | CN¥1.0B | CN¥983M | CN¥1.0B | CN¥1.0B | Accounts payablePayables |
| (CN¥421M) | (CN¥579M) | (CN¥654M) | (CN¥901M) | (CN¥748M) | (CN¥359M) | CN¥12M | (CN¥205M) | (CN¥106M) | (CN¥240M) | (CN¥240M) | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| CN¥4.2B | CN¥5.8B | CN¥7.0B | CN¥18.3B | CN¥12.9B | CN¥9.6B | CN¥9.2B | CN¥12.1B | CN¥13.2B | CN¥17.4B | CN¥17.4B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| CN¥3.0B | CN¥3.8B | CN¥6.0B | CN¥17.3B | CN¥10.5B | CN¥15.3B | CN¥13.1B | CN¥17.4B | CN¥13.3B | CN¥19.1B | CN¥19.1B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.4× | 1.5× | 1.2× | 1.1× | 1.2× | 0.6× | 0.7× | 0.7× | 1.0× | 0.9× | 0.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| CN¥172M | CN¥2.3B | CN¥2.6B | CN¥2.7B | CN¥5.0B | CN¥5.1B | CN¥5.2B | CN¥5.3B | CN¥5.2B | CN¥5.4B | CN¥5.4B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| CN¥10.0B | CN¥17.5B | CN¥24.0B | CN¥53.0B | CN¥65.2B | CN¥63.3B | CN¥61.5B | CN¥63.5B | CN¥62.6B | CN¥64.8B | CN¥64.8B | Total assetsAssets |
| 76.5× | 16.4× | 9.6× | 6.7× | -3.2× | 0.4× | -0.7× | 12.2× | 16.4× | 20.2× | 17.7× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| CN¥5.4B | CN¥6.2B | CN¥6.2B | CN¥7.4B | CN¥11.3B | CN¥10.9B | CN¥8.7B | CN¥12.1B | CN¥12.2B | CN¥12.8B | CN¥12.8B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 2.83B | 2.93B | 3.04B | 3.04B | 2.93B | 3.11B | 3.11B | 3.35B | 3.28B | 3.25B | 3.07B | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| CN¥2.32 | CN¥2.81 | CN¥3.31 | CN¥3.68 | CN¥3.48 | CN¥4.11 | CN¥4.46 | CN¥6.53 | CN¥7.29 | CN¥7.79 | CN¥8.24 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| CN¥0.27 | CN¥0.42 | CN¥0.24 | CN¥0.58 | CN¥-0.75 | CN¥-0.15 | CN¥-0.59 | CN¥1.23 | CN¥0.95 | CN¥1.58 | CN¥1.67 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| — | CN¥0.56 | CN¥0.71 | CN¥0.76 | CN¥-0.26 | CN¥-0.10 | CN¥0.17 | CN¥2.02 | CN¥2.02 | CN¥2.33 | CN¥2.40 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| — | CN¥0.56 | CN¥0.64 | CN¥0.58 | CN¥-0.39 | CN¥-0.10 | CN¥0.17 | CN¥2.02 | CN¥2.02 | CN¥2.33 | CN¥2.40 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| CN¥0.10 | CN¥0.10 | CN¥0.22 | CN¥0.22 | CN¥0.23 | — | CN¥0.13 | CN¥0.62 | CN¥1.06 | CN¥1.20 | CN¥1.27 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| — | CN¥0.28 | CN¥0.37 | CN¥0.50 | CN¥0.60 | CN¥0.53 | CN¥0.34 | CN¥0.27 | CN¥0.27 | CN¥0.25 | CN¥0.32 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| CN¥1.91 | CN¥2.11 | CN¥2.03 | CN¥2.42 | CN¥3.87 | CN¥3.51 | CN¥2.81 | CN¥3.62 | CN¥3.71 | CN¥3.94 | CN¥4.17 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before 2019 are restated ×10 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +14.4%/yr | +17.5%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +19.5%/yr (8-yr) | — |
| EPS | +21.5%/yr | — |
| Dividends / share | +32.2%/yr | +39.0%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −1.1%/yr (8-yr) | −15.6%/yr |
| Book value / share | +8.4%/yr | +0.4%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned CN¥5.1B of profit into CN¥7.6B of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | CN¥5.1B | CN¥3.1B | CN¥4.1B | (CN¥1.8B) | (CN¥480M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +CN¥1.3B | +CN¥1.3B | +CN¥1.4B | +CN¥1.5B | +CN¥1.5B |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +CN¥2.0B | +CN¥3.1B | +CN¥2.1B | +CN¥2.0B | +CN¥319M |
| Cash from operations | CN¥8.4B | CN¥7.5B | CN¥7.7B | CN¥1.6B | CN¥1.3B |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −CN¥828M | −CN¥883M | −CN¥894M | −CN¥1.0B | −CN¥1.7B |
| Owner earnings | CN¥7.6B | CN¥6.6B | CN¥6.8B | CN¥515M | (CN¥316M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 30% | 28% | 31% | 4% | -2% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 17.7×ComfortableOperating income CN¥6.8B ÷ interest expense CN¥385M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- Debt under-captured — leverage unknown, not low
What this means
This company pays far more interest than its tagged debt implies (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so its net cash or net debt cannot be read honestly: the gap is unknown, not zero, and 'net cash' here would be exactly the fiction the figure is meant to prevent. Judge it on the record and owner earnings instead.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Debt under-capturedIndustry peers: median 12%
What this means
This company's interest bill implies far more debt than its filings tag at the consolidated level (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so invested capital, and the return on it, cannot be read honestly. Judge this one on Owner Earnings and the record instead.
- High through the cycle9-yr median margin, range -7%–31%; latest CN¥7.4B = operating cash CN¥8.4B − maintenance capex CN¥998MIndustry peers: median 8%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 29% of revenue this year, a 21% median across 9 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops CN¥8.4B ÷ net income CN¥5.1B
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returns about halfDividends + buybacks CN¥4.7B ÷ Owner Earnings CN¥7.4B
What this means
Of CN¥7.4B Owner Earnings, CN¥4.7B (64%) went back to shareholders, CN¥3.9B dividends, CN¥783M buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.79×HarvestingCapex CN¥998M ÷ depreciation CN¥1.3B
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 4 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · CN¥25.3B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.91×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt —Debt ≤ working capital · —
What this means
The filings tag only a fraction of the debt this company's interest bill implies (much of it sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so this test can't be run honestly.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 3 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every tagged year (9 of 10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design. One year of this record is untagged in the data, with the dividend paid on both sides; a lone missing tag is treated as unknown, not a suspension, so the streak is judged on the tagged years.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +352%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are CN¥1.34/share (latest year CN¥1.67), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is CN¥4.17/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 7 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 3 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Operating margin 18% → 23% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The margin widened even though the filing names price competition — the gain came from volume or cost, not pricing power. Read where.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 18% early to 23% lately, median 17% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Owner earnings growth +18%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 18% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · −16.5% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Moderate contestabilityAI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.
The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investmentsCN¥15.3B
- ReceivablesCN¥723M
- InventoryCN¥57M
- Other current assetsCN¥1.4B
- Debt due within a yearCN¥135K
- Accounts payableCN¥1.0B
- Other current liabilitiesCN¥18.1B
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2017–2025
Over the record, the business generated CN¥35.9B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash builder, a large share of cash simply built up on the balance sheet.
- ReinvestedCN¥10.5B · 29%
- DividendsCN¥12.2B · 34%
- BuybacksCN¥3.5B · 10%
- Retained (debt / cash)CN¥9.7B · 27%
- Returned to ownersCN¥15.7B
59% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, CN¥12.2B as dividends and CN¥3.5B as buybacks.
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt fell CN¥4.4B and cash and short-term investments rose CN¥11.7B.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran CN¥3.5B over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count4.8%
The diluted count rose from 2931M to 3072M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend recordCN¥1.20/sh
Paid in 8 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 42% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why H World Group Limited is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
1 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?4.8%
Diluted shares grew 4.8% over 2017–2025, even as the company spent CN¥3.5B on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Hotels & Resorts
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTHTH World Group Limited | CN¥25.3B | — | 18.1% | 20% | 21% |
| MGMMGM Resorts International | $17.5B | — | 12.1% | 13% | 8% |
| LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp. | $13.0B | — | 21.9% | 16% | 16% |
| CZRCaesars Entertainment Inc. | $11.5B | — | 15.7% | 5% | 5% |
| WYNNWynn Resorts Limited | $7.1B | — | 12.4% | 6% | 8% |
| PENNPENN Entertainment Inc. | $7.0B | — | 12.1% | 12% | 8% |
| BYDBoyd Gaming | $4.1B | — | 16.3% | 14% | 13% |
| PKPark Hotels & Resorts | $2.5B | — | 13.0% | 4% | 8% |
| Group median | — | — | 14.3% | 12% | 8% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American Depositary Shares , each representing ten ordinary”; H World Group Limited reports in CNY, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at CNY 1 = $0.147 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in CNY.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what H World Group Limited has delivered.
H World Group Limited’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, H World Group Limited earns about $766M on its 20.5% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 29.2% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $1.1B on 307M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net cash $2.2B. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← HTCO its page in the Manual HTLM →
Industry order: ← HLT the Hotels & Resorts chapter IHG →