Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← PDD Manual PERF → ← OMSE Oilfield Services & Equipment PTEN →

PDS, Precision Drilling Corporation

Oilfield Services & Equipment capital-intensive Capital build-outCyclical

Precision offers an industry-leading digital technology portfolio known as Alpha TM technologies that leverages advanced automation software and analytics to generate more efficient, predictable, and repeatable results for our customers.

Our drilling services are further enhanced by our EverGreen TM suite of environmental solutions, which bolsters our commitment to reducing the environmental impact of our operations.

From our founding as a private drilling contractor in 1951, Precision has spent 75 years evolving alongside our customers and the energy industry, growing to become one of the most active drillers in North America.

Latest annual: FY2025 40-F · figures as filed, in CAD
PDS · Precision Drilling Corporation
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
C$1.8B
−3.1% YoY · 15% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue C$1.8B 5-yr avg C$1.7B
Gross margin 33% 5-yr avg 33%
Operating margin 33.1% 5-yr avg 17.6%
Owner-earnings margin 8% 5-yr avg 9%
Free cash flow margin 8% 5-yr avg 9%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

Situation
Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 14% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 33% and operating margin about 6.1% through the cycle, a spread the cycle sets more than the company does. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −16% and 32% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Capital spending runs about 10% of sales, below what it charges for depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on the commodity price, and the cost to lift a barrel. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 0%, above 15% in 0 of 6 years). By owner earnings: roughly 8% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 20-F →

Canada is 60% of revenue, so this is largely a single-region business.

Revenue by geography, FY2025
  • Canada60%C$1.1B
  • United States30%C$548M
  • International11%C$197M

From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
C$1.0BC$1.3BC$1.5BC$1.5BC$936MC$987MC$1.6BC$1.9BC$1.9BC$1.8BC$1.8BRevenueRevenue
30%31%33%38%29%30%38%34%33%33%Gross marginGross mgn
(C$156M)(C$88M)(C$198M)C$95MC$41MC$193MC$312MC$611MC$224MC$112MC$611MOperating incomeOp. inc.
−15.5%−6.7%−12.9%6.1%4.4%19.5%19.3%31.5%11.8%6.1%33.1%Operating marginOp. mgn
(C$156M)(C$132M)(C$294M)C$7M(C$120M)(C$177M)(C$34M)C$289MC$111MC$2MC$2MNet incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
C$123MC$117MC$293MC$288MC$226MC$139MC$237MC$501MC$482MC$413MC$413MOperating cash flowOp. cash
C$392MC$378MC$377MC$334MC$316MC$282MC$279MC$298MC$309MC$318MC$318MDepreciationDeprec.
(C$114M)(C$129M)C$211M(C$52M)C$30MC$34M(C$8M)(C$86M)C$62MC$93MC$93MWorking capital & otherWC & other
C$203MC$75MC$115MC$160MC$62MC$76MC$184MC$225MC$217MC$263MC$263MCapexCapex
20.3%5.7%7.4%10.4%6.6%7.7%11.4%11.6%11.4%14.3%14.3%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
(C$81M)C$42MC$179MC$128MC$165MC$63MC$53MC$276MC$265MC$149MC$149MOwner earningsOwner earn.
−8.1%3.2%11.6%8.3%17.6%6.4%3.3%14.2%14.0%8.1%8.1%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
(C$81M)C$42MC$179MC$128MC$165MC$63MC$53MC$276MC$265MC$149MC$149MFree cash flowFCF
−8.1%3.2%11.6%8.3%17.6%6.4%3.3%14.2%14.0%8.1%8.1%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
-3%-2%-5%3%7%3%ROICROIC
-8%-7%-19%0%-9%-14%-3%24%7%0%0%Return on equityROE
−8%−7%−19%0%−9%−14%−3%24%7%0%0%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
C$116MC$65MC$97MC$75MC$109MC$41MC$22MC$54MC$74MC$86MC$86MCash & investmentsCash+inv
C$294MC$323MC$372MC$310MC$207MC$256MC$414MC$414MC$379MC$352MC$352MReceivablesReceiv.
C$24MC$25MC$34MC$32MC$26MC$23MC$35MC$35MC$43MC$49MC$49MInventoryInvent.
C$241MC$210MC$274MC$3MC$151MC$224MC$392MC$404MC$314MC$281MC$281MAccounts payablePayables
C$77MC$138MC$132MC$339MC$83MC$55MC$57MC$45MC$108MC$120MC$120MOperating working capitalOper. WC
C$472MC$442MC$523MC$418MC$342MC$320MC$471MC$471MC$501MC$487MC$487MCurrent assetsCur. assets
C$241MC$210MC$282MC$216MC$167MC$238MC$410MC$422MC$339MC$300MC$300MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
2.0×2.1×1.9×1.9×2.1×1.3×1.1×1.1×1.5×1.6×1.6×Current ratioCurr. ratio
C$207MC$205MC$0C$0GoodwillGoodwill
C$4.3BC$3.9BC$3.6BC$3.3BC$2.9BC$2.7BC$2.9BC$2.9BC$3.0BC$2.7BC$2.7BTotal assetsAssets
C$1.9BC$1.7BC$1.7BC$1.4BC$1.2BC$1.1BC$1.1BC$1.1BC$812MC$679MC$679MTotal debtDebt
C$1.8BC$1.7BC$1.6BC$1.4BC$1.1BC$1.1BC$1.1BC$1.0BC$739MC$594MC$594MNet debt / (cash)Net debt
-1.1×-0.6×-1.6×0.8×0.4×2.1×3.5×7.3×3.2×2.0×10.7×Interest coverageInt. cov.
C$2.0BC$1.8BC$1.6BC$1.5BC$1.4BC$1.2BC$1.2BC$1.2BC$1.7BC$1.6BC$1.6BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
14.7M14.7M14.7M14.5M13.7M13.3M13.5M13.8M14.2M13.3M12.9MShares out (diluted)Shares
C$68.45C$90.11C$105.00C$106.01C$68.19C$74.12C$119.39C$140.89C$133.69C$138.27C$142.56Revenue / shareRev/sh
C$-10.61C$-9.01C$-20.05C$0.46C$-8.76C$-13.32C$-2.53C$21.03C$7.81C$0.14C$0.14EPS (diluted)EPS
C$-5.52C$2.85C$12.18C$8.82C$11.99C$4.75C$3.90C$20.04C$18.65C$11.21C$11.55Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
C$-5.52C$2.85C$12.18C$8.82C$11.99C$4.75C$3.90C$20.04C$18.65C$11.21C$11.55Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
C$13.88C$5.10C$7.81C$11.00C$4.48C$5.70C$13.60C$16.36C$15.23C$19.76C$20.37Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
C$133.87C$123.47C$106.13C$105.06C$102.51C$92.04C$90.84C$89.47C$117.89C$118.80C$122.49Book value / shareBVPS

Share counts before 2019 are restated ×1/20 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+8.1%/yr+15.2%/yr
Owner earnings / share−1.3%/yr
Capital spending / share+4.0%/yr+34.5%/yr
Book value / share−1.3%/yr+3.0%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.

Share count
13Mpeak FY2018
ROIC
3%low FY2018
Gross margin
33%low FY2021
Net debt ÷ owner earnings
4.0×peak FY2017

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

C$149Mowner earningsvs.C$2Mnet incomelow FY2016

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned C$2M of profit into C$149M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

Reported net incomeC$2M
Owner earningsC$149M · 8% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net incomeC$2MC$111MC$289M(C$34M)(C$177M)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+C$318M+C$309M+C$298M+C$279M+C$282M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+C$93M+C$62M−C$86M−C$8M+C$34M
Cash from operationsC$413MC$482MC$501MC$237MC$139M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−C$263M−C$217M−C$225M−C$184M−C$76M
Owner earningsC$149MC$265MC$276MC$53MC$63M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue8%14%14%3%6%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 40-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income C$611M ÷ interest expense C$57M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? C$594M · 1.0× operating profit
    Modest net debt
    Cash C$86M − debt C$679M
    What this means

    Netting C$86M of cash and short-term investments against C$679M of debt leaves C$594M owed, about 1.0× a year's operating profit (1.1× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Tight
    DSO 70 + DIO 14 − DPO 83 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    6-yr median, range -5%–7%; the latest year is left out — large non-operating charges put its operating line well above pretax profit
    Industry peers: median -1%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 6 years, so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range -8%–18%; latest C$149M = operating cash C$413M − maintenance capex C$263M
    Industry peers: median 4%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 8% of revenue this year, a 8% median across 10 years.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops C$413M ÷ net income C$2M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.83×
    Maintaining
    Capex C$263M ÷ depreciation C$318M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 4 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size
    Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · C$1.8B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.

  • Strong liquidity Near
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.62×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Miss
    Debt ≤ working capital · C$679M vs C$187M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · 6 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · none paid
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth
    Earnings +33% over the record ·
    What this means

    Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are C$10.37/share (latest year C$0.14), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is C$122.49/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 4 of 10
    What this means

    Lost money in 6 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 1 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin −12% → 16% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −12% early to 16% lately, median 6% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Worst year 2016 · −15.5% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2016, understand why before trusting the good years.

  • How management talks about it Owner’s terms
    What this means

    The record and the register agree: capital is compounding and the filing reasons in an owner’s terms — per-share value, return on capital, the long term — not a promoter’s.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Framed as a capability

The filing positions AI as something the company uses, not something it fears.

“In 2025, Precision continued to solidify its leadership in innovation by driving advancements in automation, robotics, predictive maintenance technologies, and the use of artificial intelligence.”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assetsC$487M
  • Cash & short-term investmentsC$86M
  • ReceivablesC$352M
  • InventoryC$49M
Current liabilitiesC$300M
  • Accounts payableC$281M
  • Other current liabilitiesC$19M
Current ratio1.62×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.46×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.29×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capitalC$187Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Deeper floors
Tangible book valueC$1.6Bequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value(C$1.0B)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leasesC$753MC$73M of it operating leases

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated C$2.8B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.

  • ReinvestedC$1.6B · 56%
  • Retained (debt / cash)C$1.2B · 44%
  • Source of fundingOperating cash

    Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt fell C$1.2B and cash and short-term investments fell C$30M.

  • Net change in share count−11.8%

    The diluted count fell from 15M to 13M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.

  • Dividend record

    No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Precision Drilling Corporation is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

None of the 4 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.

Each test came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did the share count rise anyway?
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Oilfield Services & Equipment

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
HPHelmerich & Payne$3.7B0.7%-1%4%
NENoble Corporation plc A$3.3B16.2%7%11%
NBRNabors Industries$3.2B37%1.8%-2%4%
ACDCProFrac Holding Corp.$1.9B-2.5%-3%3%
PDSPrecision Drilling CorporationC$1.8B33%6.1%0%8%
RESRPC$1.6B26%4.8%7%5%
XPROExpro Group Holdings N.V.$1.6B95%-12.2%-8%-1%
SDRLSeadrill Limited$1.1B28.5%-7%
Group median35%3.3%-1%4%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Precision Drilling Corporation reports in CAD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that CAD, ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share in CAD. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio and the exchange rate, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Precision Drilling Corporation has delivered.

C$

Through the cycle, Precision Drilling Corporation earns about C$151M on its 8.2% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 8.1% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+37%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · since FY2017+17%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings C$149M on 13M shares outstanding, per the 40-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net debt C$594M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/PDS, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← PDD its page in the Manual PERF →

Industry order: ← OMSE the Oilfield Services & Equipment chapter PTEN →