← All companies ← PRTA Manual PRU → ← POWWP Commercial Services & Supplies PSFE →
PRTH, Priority Technology Holdings Inc.
Priority operates at scale across three primary business segments: Merchant Solutions, Payables and Treasury Solutions and is presently serving approximat ely 1.8 million customer accounts processing approximately $150.0 billion in annual transaction activity while administering approximately $1.7 billion dollars in account balances.
Priority builds with intention, utilizing market research and stakeholder feedback to drive growth activity.
The result is an end-to-end solution that customers leverage across their financial lifecycle, engineered to accelerate cash flow and optimize working capital.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Merchant Solutions (67%), Treasury Solutions (22%) and Payables (10%).
- Situation
- Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 28% and operating margin about 7.5% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. The operating margin has swung widely — from 1.9% to 15% — on a steadier 28% gross margin, so what moves it sits below the gross line, in operating spend and one-off charges more than in the cost of the product itself. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run in the teens (median 16%, above 15% in 2 of 3 years), though buybacks and expensed R&D and brands shrink the capital base, so the figure overstates the underlying economics. The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 6% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Returns like these are solid but short of clear franchise economics; whether they hold is what the 10-K settles, not the multiple.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Merchant Solutions is 67% of revenue, with Treasury Solutions the other meaningful segment at 22%.
- Merchant Solutions67%$640M
- Treasury Solutions22%$214M
- Payables10%$99M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $344M | $382M | $376M | $372M | $404M | $515M | $664M | $756M | $880M | $953M | $978M | RevenueRevenue |
| — | 27% | 28% | 32% | 31% | — | — | — | — | — | 70% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 5% | 6% | 9% | 8% | 6% | 6% | 5% | 6% | 5% | 7% | 7% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| $26M | $34M | $16M | $7M | $21M | $33M | $56M | $82M | $133M | $141M | $142M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 7.5% | 9.0% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 5.2% | 6.4% | 8.5% | 10.8% | 15.2% | 14.8% | 14.5% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $20M | $4M | ($18M) | ($34M) | $26M | ($25M) | ($39M) | ($49M) | ($24M) | $56M | $57M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 0% | 0% | — | — | 30% | — | — | — | — | — | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $22M | $37M | $31M | $12M | $12M | $9M | $71M | $81M | $86M | $100M | $114M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $15M | $15M | $20M | $39M | $41M | $50M | $71M | $68M | $58M | $63M | $67M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($15M) | $17M | $28M | $3M | ($57M) | ($19M) | $33M | $55M | $45M | ($30M) | ($22M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $4M | $7M | $11M | $11M | $7M | $10M | $19M | $21M | $22M | $25M | $25M | CapexCapex |
| 1.2% | 1.7% | 2.8% | 3.0% | 1.8% | 1.9% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 2.6% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $18M | $30M | $21M | $962K | $5M | ($342K) | $52M | $60M | $64M | $75M | $89M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 5.3% | 7.9% | 5.5% | 0.3% | 1.2% | −0.1% | 7.8% | 7.9% | 7.3% | 7.9% | 9.1% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $18M | $30M | $21M | $962K | $5M | ($342K) | $52M | $60M | $64M | $75M | $89M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 5.3% | 7.9% | 5.5% | 0.3% | 1.2% | −0.1% | 7.8% | 7.9% | 7.3% | 7.9% | 9.1% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $0 | $0 | $8M | $184K | $0 | $407M | $5M | $28M | $0 | $39M | $35M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $10M | $3M | $7M | $0 | $0 | $7M | $11M | $25M | $24M | $0 | $0 | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | $0 | $0 | $2M | $0 | $2M | $7M | $1M | — | — | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 22% | — | — | — | 5% | — | — | — | — | 16% | 16% | ROICROIC |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $363K | $172K | $34M | $3M | $9M | $20M | $18M | $40M | $59M | $77M | $92M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $47M | $36M | $38M | $41M | $58M | $78M | $59M | $68M | $91M | $89M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $8M | $8M | $8M | InventoryInvent. |
| $111K | $19M | $28M | $27M | $30M | $43M | $52M | $11M | $15M | $20M | $59M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $29M | $9M | $11M | $12M | $16M | $26M | $48M | $61M | $80M | $38M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $419K | $106M | $75M | $94M | $136M | $603M | $652M | $881M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $1.6B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $150K | $66M | $63M | $93M | $149M | $584M | $630M | $852M | $1.1B | $1.4B | $1.5B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 2.8× | 1.6× | 1.2× | 1.0× | 0.9× | 1.0× | 1.0× | 1.0× | 1.1× | 1.1× | 1.1× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | $102M | $110M | $110M | $107M | $14M | $369M | $376M | $376M | $417M | $417M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $55M | $267M | $379M | $465M | $418M | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.6B | $1.8B | $2.4B | $2.5B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $276M | $405M | $490M | $377M | $610M | $605M | $639M | $930M | $1.0B | $1.0B | Total debtDebt |
| — | $275M | $372M | $486M | $368M | $590M | $587M | $599M | $872M | $962M | $954M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 5.4× | 1.4× | 0.5× | 0.2× | 0.5× | 0.9× | 1.0× | 1.1× | 1.5× | 1.6× | 1.6× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $116M | ($90M) | ($94M) | ($126M) | ($99M) | ($64M) | ($104M) | ($148M) | ($167M) | ($100M) | ($90M) | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.2% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 65.9M | 67.1M | 61.6M | 67.1M | 67.3M | 71.9M | 78.2M | 78.3M | 78.0M | 81.5M | 83.6M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $5.23 | $5.69 | $6.10 | $5.54 | $6.01 | $7.16 | $8.48 | $9.65 | $11.28 | $11.70 | $11.69 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $0.31 | $0.06 | $-0.29 | $-0.50 | $0.38 | $-0.34 | $-0.50 | $-0.63 | $-0.31 | $0.68 | $0.68 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.28 | $0.45 | $0.34 | $0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.00 | $0.66 | $0.77 | $0.82 | $0.92 | $1.06 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.28 | $0.45 | $0.34 | $0.01 | $0.07 | $-0.00 | $0.66 | $0.77 | $0.82 | $0.92 | $1.06 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.15 | $0.05 | $0.11 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.32 | $0.30 | $0.00 | $0.00 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.06 | $0.10 | $0.17 | $0.17 | $0.11 | $0.14 | $0.24 | $0.27 | $0.28 | $0.31 | $0.30 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $1.76 | $-1.34 | $-1.53 | $-1.88 | $-1.47 | $-0.89 | $-1.33 | $-1.89 | $-2.14 | $-1.23 | $-1.07 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before 2017 are restated ×1/2 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +9.4%/yr | +14.2%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +14.3%/yr | +67.2%/yr |
| EPS | +9.3%/yr | +12.4%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +19.4%/yr | +22.5%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $56M of profit into $75M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $56M | ($24M) | ($49M) | ($39M) | ($25M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$63M | +$58M | +$68M | +$71M | +$50M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$11M | +$6M | +$7M | +$6M | +$3M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$30M | +$45M | +$55M | +$33M | −$19M |
| Cash from operations | $100M | $86M | $81M | $71M | $9M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$25M | −$22M | −$21M | −$19M | −$10M |
| Owner earnings | $75M | $64M | $60M | $52M | ($342K) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 8% | 7% | 8% | 8% | 0% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $11M), owner earnings is nearer $64M.
Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income $141M ÷ interest expense $91M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $962M · 6.8× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $77M − debt $1.0B
What this means
Netting $77M of cash and short-term investments against $1.0B of debt leaves $962M owed, about 6.8× a year's operating profit (7.4× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- TightDSO 35 + DIO 11 − DPO 26 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- High through the cycle3-yr median, range 5%–22%; 16% latest = NOPAT $141M ÷ invested capital $862MIndustry peers: median 5%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 3 years (it ran 16% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -0%–8%; latest $75M = operating cash $100M − maintenance capex $25MIndustry peers: median 12%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 8% of revenue this year, a 6% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $11M of SBC) leaves $64M.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $100M ÷ net income $56M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $1M ÷ Owner Earnings $75M
What this means
Of $75M Owner Earnings, $1M (2%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $1M buybacks. But the buybacks barely exceed stock issued to employees ($11M SBC), net of dilution, little was truly returned. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.39×HarvestingCapex $25M ÷ depreciation $63M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $953M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.07×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $1.0B vs $105M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 6 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 7 of 10 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −380%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.07/share (latest year $0.68), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $-1.22/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 4 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 6 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 2 of 9 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 7% → 14% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 7% early to 14% lately, median 8% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 20%
What this means
Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.
- Owner earnings growth +12%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 12% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2019 · 1.9% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −5.2%/yr
What this means
The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Elevated contestabilityThe product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.
“In addition, competitors and other third parties may incorporate artificial intelligence into products and offerings more quickly or more successfully than we do, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and adversely affect our results of operations.”
AI has collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$92M
- Receivables$89M
- Inventory$8M
- Other current assets$1.4B
- Debt due within a year$525K
- Accounts payable$59M
- Other current liabilities$1.4B
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $462M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$136M · 30%
- Dividends$88M · 19%
- Buybacks$13M · 3%
- Retained (debt / cash)$225M · 49%
- Returned to owners$101M
31% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $88M as dividends and $13M as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks$6.23
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 1M shares were bought for $9M, about $6.23 each.
- Net change in share count27.0%
The diluted count rose from 66M to 84M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$0.00/sh
Paid in 7 of the years on record. It was cut at least once along the way.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Thomas Priore | $5.0M | $4.9M | $60M |
| 2024 | Thomas Priore | $5.0M | $7.1M | $64M |
| 2025 | Thomas Priore | $8.0M | $6.3M | $75M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership59.4%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$11M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 8% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Priority Technology Holdings Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
1 of the 3 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?27.0%
Diluted shares grew 27.0% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $13M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Income taxes, Acquisitions, Contingencies as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Commercial Services & Supplies
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXLSExlService | $2.1B | 86% | 12.5% | 14% | 12% |
| FICOFair Isaac | $2.0B | 73% | 30.6% | 35% | 29% |
| HQYHealthEquity | $1.3B | 60% | 14.0% | 5% | 24% |
| GETYGetty Images Holdings Inc. | $981M | 73% | 19.2% | — | 10% |
| PRTHPriority Technology Holdings Inc. | $953M | 30% | 8.0% | 16% | 6% |
| NUTXNutex Health Inc. | $875M | 39% | -12.8% | -182% | 10% |
| EEXEmerald Holding Inc. | $463M | 71% | 7.0% | 3% | 23% |
| RMNIRimini Street Inc. (DE) | $422M | 62% | 8.3% | — | 8% |
| Group median | — | 67% | 10.4% | 9% | 11% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Priority Technology Holdings Inc. has delivered.
Priority Technology Holdings Inc.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Priority Technology Holdings Inc. earns about $61M on its 6.4% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 7.9% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $89M on 82M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-04; net debt $954M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← PRTA its page in the Manual PRU →
Industry order: ← POWWP the Commercial Services & Supplies chapter PSFE →