← All companies ← CGEN Manual CHA → ← CFLT Software CHKP →
CGNT, Cognyte Software Ltd.
Software can help organizations uncover the unknown by revealing patterns and anomalies, providing near real-time insights, and accelerating decision-making.
As data ecosystems become increasingly complex, there is a growing need for solutions that can seamlessly aggregate, interpret and derive actionable intelligence from highly fragmented information, while maintaining security and governance.
Bad actors are leveraging advanced technologies to avoid detection, making it more difficult to identify and mitigate threats.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Software service (47%), Products (40%) and Professional service and other (13%).
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 69% and operating margin about 2.3% through the cycle, a wide spread between price and the cost of what it sells — whether that advantage is durable pricing power or a margin that can erode is the question the record is for. The operating margin has swung widely — from −33% to 6.0% — on a steadier 69% gross margin, so what moves it sits below the gross line, in operating spend and one-off charges more than in the cost of the product itself. Read this kind of business on retention and the cost of growth. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 4%, above 15% in 0 of 7 years). The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 9% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Revenue spreads across 3 lines, the largest Software service at 47%.
- Software service47%$188M
- Products40%$162M
- Professional service and other13%$51M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2019–2026
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | 2026’26 | TTMTTMJan 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||
| $433M | $457M | $443M | $474M | $312M | $313M | $351M | $400M | $400M | RevenueRevenue |
| 59% | 64% | 70% | 72% | 62% | 69% | 70% | 72% | 72% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| $19M | $27M | $18M | $11M | ($103M) | ($18M) | ($5M) | $13M | $13M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 4.3% | 6.0% | 4.1% | 2.3% | −33.1% | −5.8% | −1.5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $12M | $27M | $20M | ($10M) | ($110M) | ($12M) | ($7M) | $5M | $5M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 38% | 9% | 18% | — | — | — | — | 59% | 59% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||
| $54M | $67M | $71M | $3M | ($37M) | $35M | $47M | $40M | $40M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $21M | $17M | $23M | $21M | $18M | $14M | $14M | $12M | $12M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $20M | $22M | $28M | ($8M) | $55M | $32M | $40M | $24M | $24M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $10M | $14M | $14M | $12M | $8M | $7M | $11M | $10M | $10M | CapexCapex |
| 2.3% | 3.0% | 3.2% | 2.5% | 2.7% | 2.2% | 3.0% | 2.6% | 2.6% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $44M | $53M | $57M | ($9M) | ($45M) | $28M | $36M | $30M | $30M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 10.1% | 11.7% | 12.9% | −1.9% | −14.5% | 8.8% | 10.3% | 7.5% | 7.5% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $44M | $53M | $57M | ($9M) | ($45M) | $28M | $36M | $30M | $30M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 10.1% | 11.7% | 12.9% | −1.9% | −14.5% | 8.8% | 10.3% | 7.5% | 7.5% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | 10% | 8% | 4% | -51% | -12% | -5% | 7% | 7% | ROICROIC |
| — | 6% | 8% | -4% | -57% | -6% | -4% | 2% | 2% | Return on equityROE |
| — | 6% | 8% | −4% | −57% | −6% | −4% | 2% | 2% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||
| $240M | $208M | $83M | $163M | $52M | $74M | $113M | $117M | $117M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $180M | $175M | $179M | $113M | $113M | $109M | $123M | $123M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $15M | $15M | $14M | $25M | $25M | $19M | $16M | $16M | InventoryInvent. |
| — | $43M | $42M | $37M | $21M | $21M | $25M | $27M | $27M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $152M | $148M | $157M | $118M | $117M | $103M | $112M | $112M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $512M | $350M | $420M | $252M | $265M | $286M | $298M | $298M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $280M | $299M | $320M | $194M | $190M | $219M | $224M | $224M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 1.8× | 1.2× | 1.3× | 1.3× | 1.4× | 1.3× | 1.3× | 1.3× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $147M | $158M | $158M | $158M | $126M | $127M | $126M | $127M | $127M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | $805M | $629M | $665M | $443M | $472M | $498M | $521M | $521M | Total assetsAssets |
| ($240M) | ($208M) | ($83M) | ($163M) | ($52M) | ($74M) | ($113M) | ($117M) | ($117M) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 37.5× | 56.8× | 98.8× | 55.9× | -64.7× | -1128.4× | -51.3× | 68.4× | 828.8× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| — | $445M | $258M | $285M | $194M | $198M | $198M | $207M | $207M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||
| 65.8M | 65.8M | 65.8M | 66.6M | 67.9M | 70.1M | 71.8M | 72.9M | 73.1M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $6.59 | $6.95 | $6.74 | $7.12 | $4.59 | $4.47 | $4.88 | $5.49 | $5.47 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $0.19 | $0.42 | $0.31 | $-0.15 | $-1.62 | $-0.17 | $-0.10 | $0.06 | $0.06 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.67 | $0.81 | $0.87 | $-0.14 | $-0.67 | $0.39 | $0.50 | $0.41 | $0.41 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.67 | $0.81 | $0.87 | $-0.14 | $-0.67 | $0.39 | $0.50 | $0.41 | $0.41 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.15 | $0.21 | $0.22 | $0.18 | $0.12 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.14 | $0.14 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| — | $6.76 | $3.91 | $4.28 | $2.86 | $2.82 | $2.76 | $2.83 | $2.83 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 7-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −2.6%/yr | −4.0%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −6.7%/yr | −13.9%/yr |
| EPS | −14.4%/yr | −27.2%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −0.8%/yr | −8.0%/yr |
| Book value / share | −13.5%/yr (6-yr) | −6.3%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2019–2026Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2026 the business turned $5M of profit into $30M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $5M | ($7M) | ($12M) | ($110M) | ($10M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$12M | +$14M | +$14M | +$18M | +$21M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$24M | +$40M | +$32M | +$55M | −$8M |
| Cash from operations | $40M | $47M | $35M | ($37M) | $3M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$10M | −$11M | −$7M | −$8M | −$12M |
| Owner earnings | $30M | $36M | $28M | ($45M) | ($9M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 7% | 10% | 9% | -15% | -2% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 828.8×ComfortableOperating income $13M ÷ interest expense $16K
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- Net cash, debt-freeCash $117M − debt $0
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $117M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 112 + DIO 54 − DPO 89 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median -15%
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Solid through the cycle8-yr median margin, range -15%–13%; latest $30M = operating cash $40M − maintenance capex $10MIndustry peers: median -6%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 7% of revenue this year, a 9% median across 8 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $40M ÷ net income $5M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.87×MaintainingCapex $10M ÷ depreciation $12M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $400M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.33×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (8-yr record) · 4 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −124%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.07/share (latest year $0.06), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $2.83/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2019–2026
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 4 of 8
What this means
Lost money in 4 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Operating margin 5% → −1% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices, but the margin in the record has not followed — the claim outruns the result here.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 5% early to −1% lately, median 2% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Owner earnings growth −5%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings shrank about 5% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2023 · −33.1% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2023, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +1.5%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
- How management talks about it Promotional
What this means
The returns have faded, yet the filing reaches for a promoter’s vocabulary — world-class, best-in-class, disruptive — more than an owner’s. When the words sell harder than the results deliver, the gap is the thing to weigh.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Elevated contestabilityThe product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.
Its FY2026 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.
“In addition, the increasing availability of AI and machine learning technologies may lower barriers to developing or adopting certain capabilities, which could, over time, influence elements of competition and customer expectations.”
AI has collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Jan 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$117M
- Receivables$123M
- Inventory$16M
- Other current assets$42M
- Accounts payable$27M
- Other current liabilities$197M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2019–2026
Over the record, the business generated $280M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$86M · 31%
- Retained (debt / cash)$194M · 69%
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span cash and short-term investments fell $123M.
- Net change in share count11.1%
The diluted count rose from 66M to 73M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 8-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 8-year record, from the company's own filings.
Peers, Software
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPERXperi Inc. Common Stock | $448M | — | -29.1% | -19% | -7% |
| VIAVia Transportation Inc. | $434M | 40% | -24.8% | -24% | -21% |
| AVPTAvePoint Inc. | $419M | 72% | -10.2% | — | 12% |
| PRCHPorch Group Inc. | $419M | 66% | -58.4% | -26% | -10% |
| CERTCertara Inc. | $419M | 61% | 4.7% | -0% | 21% |
| GDYNGrid Dynamics Holdings Inc. | $412M | 38% | -0.5% | -1% | 7% |
| CGNTCognyte Software Ltd. | $400M | 69% | 2.8% | 4% | 9% |
| DDD3D Systems Corporation | $387M | 42% | -15.2% | -11% | -6% |
| Group median | — | 61% | -12.7% | -11% | 1% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Cognyte Software Ltd. reports in USD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Cognyte Software Ltd. has delivered.
Through the cycle, Cognyte Software Ltd. earns about $38M on its 9.4% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 7.5% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $30M on 73M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2026-01-31; net cash $117M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← CGEN its page in the Manual CHA →
Industry order: ← CFLT the Software chapter CHKP →