Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← GEL Manual GEN → ← GDOT Capital Markets & Asset Management GLXY →

GEMI, Gemini Space Station Inc.

Capital Markets & Asset Management diversified Unprofitable

Gemini is a trusted cryptocurrency platform building secure financial infrastructure for the next generation of money and markets, providing access for individuals and institutions to a financial future that is more open, fair, and secure.

Our products and services include spot and derivatives trading, staking, an over-the-counter ("OTC") trading desk, institutional-grade custody, a New York Department of Financial Services ("NYDFS")-regulated stablecoin (GUSD), a U.S. credit card, and a prediction markets platform.

We are building Gemini as an integrated platform with shared infrastructure for both money and markets and we intend to serve our users through a unified, multi-product experience.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
GEMI · Gemini Space Station Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$180M
+26.3% YoY
Vital signs · TTM
Cash & investments $216M
Cash burn · annual $254M
Runway 10 mo

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

Situation
Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand.
What moves the needle
Operating margin has run around −192% through the cycle, the operating line deeply negative — so the lever is the path to a margin at all: revenue growth against the cost curve and the cash runway, not the level of a margin that isn't there yet. Stock-based pay runs about 16% of sales, a real and recurring claim on owners that the GAAP margin understates. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2023–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$98M$142M$180M$195MRevenueRevenue
158%36%43%44%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
($312M)($166M)($346M)($392M)Operating incomeOp. inc.
−317.5%−116.6%−192.5%−201.4%Operating marginOp. mgn
($320M)($159M)($583M)($543M)Net incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
($207M)($109M)($218M)($254M)Operating cash flowOp. cash
$32M$33M$31M$30MDepreciationDeprec.
$64M$11M$249M$150MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$729K$1M$2M$2MCapexCapex
0.7%0.9%1.1%1.0%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
($208M)($110M)($220M)($256M)Owner earningsOwner earn.
−212.0%−77.5%−122.6%−131.6%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
($208M)($110M)($220M)($256M)Free cash flowFCF
−212.0%−77.5%−122.6%−131.6%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
-95%-129%ROICROIC
-108%-119%Return on equityROE
−108%−119%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$33M$43M$252M$216MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$65M$31M$32MReceivablesReceiv.
$18M$3M$2MAccounts payablePayables
$48M$28M$31MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$1.4B$1.6B$1.3BCurrent assetsCur. assets
$1.3B$1.2B$1.0BCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.0×1.3×1.3×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$1.6B$1.8B$1.5BTotal assetsAssets
$249M$0$0Total debtDebt
$206M($252M)($216M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
($644M)($795M)$541M$456MShareholders’ equityEquity
16.1%3.9%47.3%55.4%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
4.8M4.9M37.6M117MShares out (diluted)Shares
$20.34$28.91$4.78$1.67Revenue / shareRev/sh
$-66.25$-32.24$-15.52$-4.65EPS (diluted)EPS
$-43.11$-22.40$-5.86$-2.20Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$-43.11$-22.40$-5.86$-2.20Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.15$0.25$0.05$0.02Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$-133.53$-161.72$14.40$3.91Book value / shareBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×7.64 into 2025 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×3.1 into TTM — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The record, charted

FY2023–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
38Mpeak FY2025

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

($220M)owner earningsvs.($583M)net incomelow FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $583M loss into ($220M) of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

FY2025FY2024FY2023
Reported net income($583M)($159M)($320M)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$31M+$33M+$32M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$85M+$6M+$16M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$249M+$11M+$64M
Cash from operations($218M)($109M)($207M)
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$2M−$1M−$729K
Owner earnings($220M)($110M)($208M)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue-123%-78%-212%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $85M), owner earnings is nearer ($305M).

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →
Material weakness in financial controls
“We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.”

The figures below are only as sound as the controls that produced them. read the note →

Will it survive?

  • No meaningful interest burden
    Little or no interest expense reported
    What this means

    Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.

  • Net cash, debt-free
    Cash $252M − debt $0
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $252M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average
    NOPAT ($273M) ÷ invested capital $289M (debt + equity − cash)
    Industry peers: median -8%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Consumes cash through the cycle
    3-yr median margin, range -212%–-78%; latest ($220M) = operating cash ($218M) − maintenance capex $2M
    Industry peers: median 14%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -123% of revenue this year, a -123% median across 3 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $85M of SBC) leaves ($305M).

  • Loss, and burning cash
    Net income ($583M) · cash from operations ($218M)

    In the filing’s words The filing discloses a material weakness in its financial controls — the reported numbers here, and the record built on them, are only as reliable as the controls that produced them.

    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did not.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.06×
    Harvesting
    Capex $2M ÷ depreciation $31M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 3 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $180M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.29×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $0 vs $366M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-3.03/share (latest year $-5.00), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $4.64/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Named as a competitive risk

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat.

“For example, disruptive technologies such as generative AI may fundamentally alter the use of our products or services in unpredictable ways.”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$1.3B
  • Cash & short-term investments$216M
  • Receivables$32M
  • Other current assets$1.1B
Current liabilities$1.0B
  • Accounts payable$2M
  • Other current liabilities$1.0B
Current ratio1.27×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.27×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.21×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$288Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Cash runway0.8 yrsthe business is consuming cash; this is how long the cash on hand lasts at that rate
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+42.3%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters1.0× → 1.3×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$322Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value$269MGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$26M$26M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$3Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.

  • Insider ownership<1%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$85M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 47% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Income taxes, Credit & receivables, Stock compensation as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Capital Markets & Asset Management

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
PGYPagaya Technologies Ltd.$1.3B41%-1.3%4%3%
PWPPerella Weinberg Partners$751M-7.6%15%
DAVEDave Inc.$554M-4.2%-12%13%
WDWalker & Dunlop$320M143.4%14%149%
GEMIGemini Space Station Inc.$180M-192.5%-95%-123%
GPGIGPGI Inc.$60M53%30.4%-3%27%
GREELGreenidge Generation Holdings Inc.$59M-16.2%-193%
FWDIForward Industries Inc.$18M20%-3.9%-21%-1%
Group median-4.0%-12%13%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Gemini Space Station Inc. is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.

$
The assumptions

Enter a price to run it.

Owner earnings it must reach
Margin the price demands
Owner-earnings margin today−132%

Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Gemini Space Station Inc. (GEMI), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/GEMI, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← GEL its page in the Manual GEN →

Industry order: ← GDOT the Capital Markets & Asset Management chapter GLXY →