← All companies ← LEGN Manual LGCL → ← LAUR Education Services LINC →
LFS, LEIFRAS Co. Ltd.
Revenue is School Business (73%) and Social Business (27%).
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- A diversified business; where the profit really comes from, and whether it is earned or bought, is what the segment detail settles.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 29% and operating margin about 5.0% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. That margin has held in a narrow 4.3%–5.3% band over the years, so steadiness itself is the evidence — the lever is unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run high across the record (median 28%, above 15% in 3 of 3 years), though buybacks and expensed R&D and brands shrink the capital base, so the figure overstates the underlying economics. The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 4% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →School Business is 73% of revenue, with Social Business the other meaningful segment at 27%.
- School Business73%¥8.6B
- Social Business27%¥3.2B
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2023–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||
| ¥9.3B | ¥10.3B | ¥11.7B | ¥11.7B | RevenueRevenue |
| 25% | 29% | 30% | 30% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| ¥396M | ¥520M | ¥627M | ¥627M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 4.3% | 5.0% | 5.3% | 5.3% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ¥245M | ¥419M | ¥438M | ¥438M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 40% | 22% | 28% | 28% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||
| ¥678M | ¥207M | ¥468M | ¥468M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| ¥92M | ¥122M | ¥126M | ¥126M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ¥340M | (¥334M) | (¥96M) | (¥96M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| ¥4M | ¥15M | ¥43M | ¥43M | CapexCapex |
| 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.4% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ¥674M | ¥192M | ¥426M | ¥426M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 7.2% | 1.9% | 3.6% | 3.6% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ¥674M | ¥192M | ¥426M | ¥426M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 7.2% | 1.9% | 3.6% | 3.6% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| 38% | 28% | 22% | 22% | ROICROIC |
| 39% | 40% | 24% | 24% | Return on equityROE |
| 39% | 40% | 24% | 24% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||
| — | ¥5M | ¥5M | ¥5M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | ¥518M | ¥731M | ¥731M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | ¥24M | ¥22M | ¥22M | InventoryInvent. |
| — | ¥168M | ¥197M | ¥197M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | ¥375M | ¥556M | ¥556M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | ¥3.3B | ¥3.5B | ¥3.5B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | ¥2.9B | ¥2.2B | ¥2.2B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 1.2× | 1.5× | 1.5× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| ¥28M | ¥28M | ¥28M | ¥28M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | ¥4.5B | ¥4.7B | ¥4.7B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | ¥406M | ¥175M | ¥175M | Total debtDebt |
| — | ¥401M | ¥170M | ¥170M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 28.6× | 31.5× | 38.1× | 38.1× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| ¥622M | ¥1.0B | ¥1.8B | ¥1.8B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | ||||
| 28.6M | 26.5M | 25.2M | 26.2M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| ¥325.75 | ¥389.49 | ¥465.52 | ¥448.32 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| ¥8.59 | ¥15.78 | ¥17.40 | ¥16.76 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| ¥23.60 | ¥7.24 | ¥16.90 | ¥16.27 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| ¥23.60 | ¥7.24 | ¥16.90 | ¥16.27 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| ¥0.13 | ¥0.57 | ¥1.69 | ¥1.63 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| ¥21.79 | ¥39.25 | ¥73.30 | ¥70.59 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The record, charted
FY2023–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business reported ¥438M of profit but ¥426M of owner earnings: ¥13M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ¥438M | ¥419M | ¥245M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +¥126M | +¥122M | +¥92M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −¥96M | −¥334M | +¥340M |
| Cash from operations | ¥468M | ¥207M | ¥678M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −¥43M | −¥15M | −¥4M |
| Owner earnings | ¥426M | ¥192M | ¥674M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 4% | 2% | 7% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 38.1×ComfortableOperating income ¥627M ÷ interest expense ¥16M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? ¥170M · 0.3× operating profitModest net debtCash ¥0 + ST investments ¥5M − debt ¥175M
What this means
Netting ¥5M of cash and short-term investments against ¥175M of debt leaves ¥170M owed, about 0.3× a year's operating profit. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- TightDSO 23 + DIO 1 − DPO 9 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Very high (≥25%) through the cycle3-yr median, range 22%–38%; 22% latest = NOPAT ¥453M ÷ invested capital ¥2.0BIndustry peers: median 8%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 3 years (it ran 22% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Thin through the cycle3-yr median margin, range 2%–7%; latest ¥426M = operating cash ¥468M − maintenance capex ¥43MIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 4% of revenue this year, a 4% median across 3 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops ¥468M ÷ net income ¥438M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.34×HarvestingCapex ¥43M ÷ depreciation ¥126M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 2 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · ¥11.7B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.54×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · ¥175M vs ¥1.2B WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are ¥14.05/share (latest year ¥16.76), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is ¥70.59/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Moderate contestabilityAI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.
The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments¥5M
- Receivables¥731M
- Inventory¥22M
- Other current assets¥2.7B
- Debt due within a year¥151M
- Accounts payable¥197M
- Other current liabilities¥1.9B
From the company's latest filing.
Peers, Education Services
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFSLEIFRAS Co. Ltd. | ¥11.7B | 29% | 5.0% | 28% | 4% |
| GHCGraham Holdings Company | $4.9B | — | 4.6% | 3% | 5% |
| LRNStride Inc. | $2.4B | 35% | 5.8% | 11% | 11% |
| STRAStrategic Education Inc. | $1.3B | — | 10.9% | 6% | 9% |
| LOPEGrand Canyon Education Inc. | $1.1B | — | 28.1% | 27% | 24% |
| PRDOPerdoceo Education Corporation | $846M | — | 19.7% | 16% | 17% |
| UTIUniversal Technical Institute Inc | $836M | — | 1.5% | 2% | 4% |
| Group median | — | — | 5.8% | 11% | 9% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American depositary shares, each representing one ordinary”; LEIFRAS Co. Ltd. reports in JPY, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at JPY 1 = $0.0062 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in JPY.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what LEIFRAS Co. Ltd. has delivered.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $3M on 26M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net debt $1M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← LEGN its page in the Manual LGCL →
Industry order: ← LAUR the Education Services chapter LINC →